Joaquín Díaz Atienza
Celaa Education Law
Con the “Celaa Education Law” The state definitively takes control of the school, transforming it into a space conducive to... inoculate the ideology Woke of the “New Age” in the minds of the students. The school has ceased to be a breeding ground for instrumental knowledge and has mutated and degenerated into a space of psychopathological risk because its articles allow the teaching of content that goes against nature, against the objective truth of psychosexual development in childhood, and eliminates the fundamental role of parents in the education of their own children, placing it in the hands of the State.
The curriculum change has been based on three educational aspects: distortion of history, the effortless learning and comprehensive or holistic sex educationIn short, ignorance about our past as a political community, the false premise and assertion that anyone can reach the pinnacle of their personal project simply by wanting to: education based on knowledge disappears, creating instead a metaverse that bears no resemblance to reality and its demands. This magical attitude toward reality is giving rise to the formation of anomic individuals, lacking adaptive criteria, and generating, in many of them, a deep frustration, hopelessness, and depressionIt is not insignificant that suicide is the leading external cause of death among our youth. Finally, through comprehensive sex education, The aim is to construct a vision of sexuality freed from any personal responsibility, without conditions of age, sex, or orientation. The sole purpose is pleasure. and therefore it must be freed from everything that is not the free expression of instincts above any other consideration.
UN Education Policy
This new pedagogical paradigm, of a holistic nature, is not new, but rather presents a broad strategic path meticulously planned by the UN “experts” and its subsidiary structures such as UNESCO, UNICEF and WHOIt is not about giving information or providing students with objective and instrumental knowledge, but about changing mindsets and behaviors that consolidate cultural changes. The matrix of the new curricular content, especially the gender ideology and comprehensive sex education, psychologically they are sustained by the self determination, freedom of action without any other restraint than the consent and emotionality.
The WHO recommendations on comprehensive sexuality education in the schools1 It calls on member countries to begin comprehensive sexuality education from age 0, indicating a series of practical interventions that undoubtedly favor the hypersexualization of childrenThey are based on learning that not only clarifies sexuality but also involves active intervention, teaching students how to masturbate, how to practice touching each other's erogenous zones, and how to minimize the risks of sexual promiscuity compared to the advantages of pleasure. It even goes so far as to assert that preventive education regarding... sexually transmitted diseasesNot only do they lack preventive value, but they can even be counterproductive due to the fear they produce in students.
Finally, it is stated that those responsible for imparting this knowledge do not necessarily need to have specialized training; any teacher, other students with more experience, and NGOs that work with youth or groups related to sexuality, such as LGBTQ+ associations, can participate. Lastly, parental education falls under the heading of informal training She is suspected of transmitting prejudiced aspects of sexuality to her children. Therefore, she is recommended to pursue her own education.
In a future post, I will conduct a more in-depth evaluation of this "WHO" document written by the workers of the largest business in the international abortion industry: the International Planned Parenthood Federation
Note: I support sex education in schools, although I do not support the ideological terms underlying the current WHO proposals, as they are based on an ideology that seeks to transform sexuality into a mere act of pleasure, regardless of age or partner. It is simply a matter of consent, as the current Minister of Equality, Irene Monero, made perfectly clear in an interview.
- Standards for Sexuality Education in Europe, en https://www.observatoriodelainfancia.es/oia/esp/documentos_ficha.aspx?id=4019 [↩]
