"Alone and drunk, I want to get home." The new paradigm of feminist activism queer
The left in Spain never championed the cause of genuine feminism. In fact, during the Second Republic, it opposed women's suffrage, considering them intellectually unprepared, socially immature, and politically incompetent. It wasn't until the end of the dictatorship that a group of left-wing women formed a feminist movement in Spain, which would later evolve into the... Feminist PartyIts undisputed leader was the now ousted of United Left, Lidia Falcón. His sphere of influence was fairly limited to the university world. He was and is a activist feminism who fights for real equality between men and women and for overcoming clearly sexist behaviors.
«We are now witnessing the struggle for the disappearance of the masculine and the feminine, integrating men and women into a single sexual and gender perspective that they call queer«
However, today we are witnessing the Confrontational FeminismThere are many who feel perplexed and confused by these demands that have broken away from the common trunk from which they all sprang. classic feminist movements. A "feminism" that not only has lost its objectbut, in the same way, it has It has transmuted its aims. It has changed the meaning of words while maintaining the same signifier. There has been a break with the history of feminism, which they use for their own benefit and in which they do not believe.. Are two different narrative identities Because both feminisms present a different history. It is no longer the fight for equality between men and women; now we are witnessing the fight for the disappearance of the masculine and the feminine, integrating men and women into a single sexual and gender perspective that they call queer.
Current feminism is not feminism
El activist feminism It enters intensive care when the woman breaks with her own identity. The fight for equality of rights and duties becomes the sophistry she preaches far and wide. "that women are men just like everyone else", relegated to the genes to the most absolute ostracism, to the deepest silence for political reasons.
This identity rupture of feminism has been fertile ground for it to germinate and develop gender perspective and ideology at the cost of losing its very essence and the narrative identity that kept it alive. The activist feminism could not withstand the palliative care of its meager defenders and has ended up committing voluntary suicide.
Why is the current "feminism" of the left not feminism?
The answer is simpler than you might think. It depends on whether we answer. from the natural sciences or from political philosophy. The postulates on which it is based cannot be accepted from a scientific perspective, since they are contrary to all scientific evidence:
- Biological sex is irrelevant in the expression of genderThe Y chromosome and hormonal differences: are they a luxury of nature? Is their role in brain plasticity and differential brain development negligible? We could ask ourselves hundreds of questions.
- Therefore, Sex is a social construct which would be expressed in a very wide variety of genres that can vary throughout life depending on desire.
- In fact, they postulate that At birth, sexuality is undifferentiated.Therefore, it is recommended Educating children on gender perspectiveIn other words, to make them sharers in the good news that they can choose their gender with absolute freedom, regardless of their biological sex. Nothing prevents them from being a woman, a man, asexual... or even changing over time based on their desire.
- However, the most disruptive and unscientific thing is that irrational construct they call «queer vision«Goodbye to Masculine to feminine, man to woman. These categories are artificial byproducts of heteropatriarchal culture. which have only served to enslave women. It is the toxic masculinity, the man of the rape culture...which we must fight against until it disappears. But, equally, we must fight against femininity Because it remains something artificial, at the service of man. We must deconstructing male and female heterosexuality and transform the world "into a great gynaeceum ruled by the 'Big Mother'. Stop the cisgender, make room for the non-binary, for the gender fluid who must break free from the stereotypes of the heterocentric universe" ( Alain de Benoist).
The Sexual Freedom Law of Minister Irene Montero and her queer cabinet
- The law does not prosecute sexual crimes against women. Because, if that were the case, a hierarchy of crimes would have been established with proportionate penalties and well-defined definitions that would facilitate their application by judges, something that has not happened.
- With the measure that penalizes "street harassment"Under the guise of defending women, what is really being attempted is feminize menMaintaining the culture of "heterosexual under suspicion", always ready for rape, "sexual assault". It has made all men suspicious.
- Proof of the above is that, in a gender culture, harassment between subjects of the same sex and orientationor from a lesbian woman to a cisgender woman, or from a gay man to a cisgender man. The combinations that could be constructed could reach the point of absurdity. But since what matters, ultimately, is maintaining man as a genetically predisposed potential rapist, only the "cisgender" man is singled out, a category that must be diluted like a sugar cube.
- In fact, the same Ministry of Equality writes in a tweet that the "The objective of the law is that sexual violence be considered a form of male chauvinist violence socially, legally and legislatively." And what about violence between individuals of the same sex?
- En El País, Mariola Lourido She writes regarding the penalization and classification of crimes in the new law: "The Ministry of Equality is surprising in proposing..." reduce the prison sentence for rapists and sexual abusersFor the crime of rape, it proposes a prison sentence of four to ten years, compared to the current six to twelve. And it reduces the sentence to one to four years for an aggressor who violates the sexual freedom of another person without their consent. The abuse disappears. The group aggression It will not be a specific crime, but an aggravating circumstance, and new aggravating circumstances will be the rapes within a couple or ex-couple or when override the victim's will with drugs. The draft bill proposes that gender violence courts also handle sexual violence cases, with mandatory training for all personnel involved. The regulation of 'only yes means yes' "A copy of the law on gender violence, including all the prevention and assistance aspects, from creating centers for immediate care to being able to prove victim status with a social or medical certificate to receive aid without needing to file a complaint."
- The famous "only yes means yes" can be a loophole for instrumental complaints, since by requesting that these types of complaints be handled with measures already contemplated in gender violence, it is possible to receive aid without it having been verified that it was really a non-consensual relationship.
In short, this law is not rational, it is not balanced, and it does not respond to the needs of women who are victims of gender-based violence. It only seeks to criminalize men, portraying them as potential rapists who need to be kept on a tight leash.
I hope that during its processing in Congress some elements of rationality will be introduced, which it currently lacks.
