UN Women, in its legitimate desire for equality, jeopardizes some aspects covered by the Convention on the Rights of the Child, especially regarding family issues.
LUN Women, and its multiple commissions are taken over by the most radical feminist currents, including extremely dystopian positions such as the movement queer. Therefore, it is not surprising that the 65th Session of the UN Commission on the Status of Women, held from March 15 to 26, 2021, did not have the expected success, due to opposition from representatives of numerous countries.
Reasons why some proposals have not been accepted
Regardless of the manipulation in media outlets aligned with the global expansion of gender ideology—not a gender perspective—the reality of the failure is that the documentation submitted for debate by the commission persists in its intention to blur/deconstruct the concept of family. It is held responsible for generating its destruction insofar as it transforms the family into an absolutely undefined entity without structural weight, stripping it of its participatory rights in decisions that affect it. Suspicions arise from the certainty that the real objective is to destroy it. In fact, the DW In Germany, it is said that opposing countries do so because of their opposition to gender equality, without clarifying that, “gender equality”In their documents, it is a vague and broadly generic concept that objectively distances itself from the concept of real equality between men and women. Washington Post She claims that those same countries have sabotaged and repressed women's rights, another opinion that is not true. Finally, Le Monde in France, quoting Gunter Sautter, The EU representative claims, blatantly lying, that there has been a repression of women's rights.
The reality is that the document included aspects on abortion and the LGBTIQ+ Agenda considered priorities and quite far removed from the true interests regarding legitimate equality between men and women.
Furthermore, the US representative, Courtney NemeroffMore interested in the alleged discrimination suffered by the LGBTQ community at the hands of healthcare services during the pandemic than in advancing gender equality, the US blames opposing countries for having to soften its language about women and girls with disabilities. It conveniently omits the fact that the US is the only country in the world that has not ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child because they want to maintain the serious violation against children's human rights, which is the death penalty.
In reality, what it hides Courtney Nemeroff The point concerning the rights of women and girls with disabilities, specifically regarding girls with disabilities, granted them an absolutely irrational degree of autonomy, given their disability, and all at the expense of reducing the rights of their parents. On this point, except for the US and the European UnionThe vast majority of countries questioned the text, and not, as Courtney says, a “small, noisy minority”.
UN Women, completely dominated by the most extremist gender ideology, continues to prioritize a series of objectives for the 2030 Agenda:
- The rights claimed by the LGBTQI+ lobby
- Eliminate the role of the family in the education of their children and put it in the hands of the State through agents trained in gender ideology and integral sexology.
- Controversial aspects of motherhood and the priority role of women in the leadership of society
- The hyper-sexualization of childhood with an autonomy for which she is neither cognitively nor emotionally prepared and
- Excluding any other way of thinking, whether from the Catholic Church or any other religious or civil belief that does not coincide with their gender agenda.
Ultimately, the underlying conflict lies in the proposals of the more radical groups, such as the program designed by the United Nations Population Fund , on Comprehensive sex education for children through peer-to-peer interaction, where sexual activities inappropriate for childhood are recommended, including visual material with erotic content.
Also the UNESCO It has been tainted by criticism regarding the inappropriateness of these procedures. It is criticized for one of his or her comments recommend that Children who wish to engage in sexting activities can have access to private online forums for this purpose.
The reality is that adults in these UN lobbying groups draft these resolutions without consulting parents and place them under the control of international agencies such as the International Planned Parenthood Federation, widely recognized for its practices more than suspiciously disrespectful of individual and social ethics, as well as through the enrichment it obtains from governments.
However, this failure does not mean the issue is settled. The EU representative to the UN, Günter Sautter, He already tells us that they will continue to push until they achieve their goals.Even with totalitarian behaviors, “Efforts to achieve our goals will continue, even if it is in forums outside the General Assembly.” There is already precedent for this anti-democratic abuse with the agreements reached in the 2019 Nairobi Assembly, where the agreements reached exceeded what had been agreed by the Member States.
This time they have placed all their hopes on being able to commit the same outrage during the Generation Equality Forum which has been inaugurated in the Mexico City (Mexico) from March 29 to 31, 2021 and culminating in Paris (France) in June 2021.
Faced with so much totalitarianism, the Children's Rights They are in the hands of people who project onto childhood an ideology that is completely alienated from the child's vulnerable psychological reality. It needs solid, stable role models based on general consensus, without discrimination based on race, culture, sex, or belief. I don't want to be a harbinger of doom, but I do affirm that children are being led into a situation where their emotional development is at risk.
