Children are increasingly exposed to the risk of pedophiles on social media due to "erotic-philic" education.
Politicians, the justice system, teachers, and parents must be more proactive in the face of a real danger that is absolutely underestimated.
However, let's not get our hopes up. Everyone is outraged in petit committee. On the contrary, in front of the general public we maintain a complicit silence, or we show ourselves in the discourse of the politically correct, at the moment when we wish to enter into the educational and political conditions that increasingly "vulnerable" children.
I might give the impression of being a conspiracy theorist, holding extremely puritanical views, or a religious fundamentalist. However, I don't see myself reflected in any of those labels. I simply denounce publicly what I see, convinced that a genuine attack on the emotional and psychosexual integrity of children is being orchestrated in the name of their fundamental rights, even though the reality is that it benefits unscrupulous individuals whose only concern is satisfying their sexual desires at any cost.
This Saturday we had a film forum with the teenagers of Young People in Solidarity Los MillaresThe well-known film was shown. Trust where a math teacher with computer skills sexually abuses a 14-year-old girl. It's 2010. It focuses on a equivalent rape of a heterosexual type. Today, seven years later, we continue, and with greater intensity. Its ending was not as happy as what happened with the recent arrest of a homosexual pedophile by the Civil Guard who was about to commit rape with a 12-year-old boy from MalagaIt is social media and the manipulation of unscrupulous individuals willing to destroy the psychological future of children in order to satisfy their own desires. "sexual orientation". Because pedophilia, like bestiality, homosexuality, heterosexuality, bisexuality, or any other sexual inclination, are manifestations of sexual orientation absolutely recognized in the paradigm of gender ideology, that same ideology that has already deeply penetrated our culture with the approval of all political forces.
Some might argue that this isn't entirely accurate, since pedophilia is still prosecuted and widely condemned by society. And that's true, though I don't know how long that will last.
Where does this suspicion/accusation come from?
It is mandatory sex education in schools and about it I would have nothing to object to if it were not because under this name certain pansexualist approaches are hidden that refer to a specific ideological position not supported by the scientific evidence provided by evolutionary psychology.
They talk about the childhood sexuality , the universal right and therefore placed at the same level as the basic needs of childhood. The child has the right to express their sexuality as they deem appropriate, and parents cannot interfere, as that would constitute an attack on those universal rights.
In the materialization of childhood sexuality The only thing that acts as an impediment or facilitator is... consent on the part of the minor, as well as his autonomy. Failing to adhere to these bioethical principles means going against the "the benefit of the best interests of the child"In order for this universal right to be respected, it is necessary to "to bring about a cultural transformation in the way we conceive of childhood, sexuality, and the relationship between parents and children" which the authors consider excessively paternalistic.
Subsequently, they consider that information This is sufficient for children to be able to cope with risks, without going into the child's ability to anticipate risks and consequences, aspects linked to the maturation of executive functions, skills that are only fully achieved in middle adolescence (from age 16 onwards).
The preachers of this new pansexualist religion They merely spread the idea that children's needs must be recognized (what needs, those of pedophiles (pederasty), ours (incest), or those of children?). They simply manipulate language with attractive, albeit ambiguous, statements that, in essence, foreshadow an attack on the innocence of childhoodYes, the innocence of childhood, something they intend to eliminate from the vocabulary referring to this stage of development.
Here is one of the statements in question:
Only in this way can we educate our children in an attitude “erotiphilic” that allows them to develop to the fullest as people and, at the same time,"Time, having strategies and resources to protect oneself from certain risks and abuses."
Where does "respect for the sexual freedom of children" and "erotophilic education" lead us? This education will create fertile ground for certain adults, based on without the consent of the minor, they can carry out their paraphilia because, for me, pedophilia is not a type of sexual orientation, but a disorder that endangers our sons and daughters.
- REFERENCES
The Civil Guard arrests a sexual “cyber-predator” dedicated to recruiting minors - Monica Gonzalez: «Sexual rights: children and adolescents.
- Asturian Institute of Public Administration. Teaching materials for sex education in juvenile centers.
- Sexual and reproductive rights (in childhood). Chapter 6. UNICEF
