Parental consent: Parents have the right to know what the program proposed by the new government means and what content will be taught to our children. They have the right to decide.
INTRODUCTION
The debate that arose from the minister's statement Isabel Celaa, "We must not think in any way that children belong to their parents"This is more than justified in a democratic and ideologically pluralistic society like Spain is supposed to be today. Indeed, parents do not own their children.
Governments change depending on the citizens' votes. It is precisely for this reason that no government is legitimately entitled to impose its ideology on the people. core values through public school and against the values that parents wish to instill in their children.
In the statement "Children do not belong to their parents"If understood as the one who possesses an object, that is absolutely true. Parents, just like children, have Rights and duties (Art. 155 of the Civil Code). In this sense, what the minister "forgets" is that parental authority It belongs to the parents and that parental authority legally authorizes them to exercise those rights and duties with respect to the children (art. 154 of the CC). One of the rights refers to education, in full harmony with the provisions of Article 27.3 of the Spanish Constitution.
Either we move towards a single way of thinking and accept that the governments of the day interfere in the minds of our children, or we stand for freedom and diversity and we, as parents, take charge of their education, respecting the obvious: that society is plural and should remain so.
The values related to the sexuality, With the social responsability and those related to respect and tolerance Diversity is the responsibility of the parents as outlined in the Spanish constitutionIf it were the case that some parents go against some Universal values Regarding the respect due to others and the tolerance of diversity, the suggestion that these parents attend should be considered. relevant workshops And, if they persist in their efforts to educate their children in irresponsibility and hatred of difference, the State can do so. withdraw the guard and custodyThis shouldn't surprise us because it already happens when situations arise where Neglect or mistreatment in the family setting.
Why is the discussion focused on the affective-sexual education proposed by the current government, which has led to parental consent?
Because affective-sexual education is based on the well-known gender ideologyThis ideology proposes highly controversial and ideologized aspects as universal truths, aspects not supported by scientific evidence. Let's briefly review these aspects:
- GenderThis does not refer to the respect due to people with different sexual orientations or gender identities. What is imposed here is the assertion that Biological sex is irrelevantWhat defines an individual is gender, and this is chosen "freely" by individuals, completely independent of biological sex. More than 100 different genders have been described.
-Affective-sexual education: Sex is a source of pleasure where instinct should take precedence. We must allow, even encourage, the free expression of those instincts, without any kind of interferenceTo prevent the negative aspects of promiscuity and diversity in the type of sexual activity (homosexual, heterosexual, bisexual, zoophilic relationships, etc.), preventive measures are proposed: abortion, use of Condoms, the pro-abortion pill "The next day," specialized consultations in Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STDs)This instinctive sexual expression will be facilitated and channeled through workshops with students from the age of three and will form part of of the academic curriculum of students from primary school to university.
The important thing is the total absence of repression Regarding the sexual needs of students, Sexuality it transforms into genitalitydetaching oneself from any kind of romantic relationship. This may or may not coexist. What is important is pleasure and mutual attraction. This view of sexual experience has its antecedents in the Kinsey Report, H. Marcuse ("Eros and Civilization"), W. Reich ("The Function of the Orgasm"), and radical feminism or female chauvinism, which aims to displace heteropatriarchy through the imposition of women over men (not through equality between men and women). One need only read the writings of the current director of Women's Institute, Beatriz Gimeno.
- The: We need to deconstruct the concept of traditional family which they consider the source of all educational ills regarding equality, and also the great obstacle to the implementation of gender ideology. There is no longer one family, but rather families: traditional (to be destroyed), single-parent, same-sex parent, etc. The aim is to infiltrate the traditional family to strip it of any rights over its children's education through threats of losing custody. This is what has happened in countries like Sweden, where there are cases of parents losing custody because they are considered "excessively" religious or insufficiently committed to the new ideology.
Would teaching radically opposing values at school and at home affect the socio-emotional development of our children?
The moral development of our children has direct consequences on their socio-emotional development, inevitably shaping their character. emotional control, their sexual practices, and the type of socialization. Therefore, it will depend on what we as parents want our children to be in their adolescence and adult life, so that in the family environment we can instill in them by example the values that we consider relevant.
Si en the school They are taught values radically opposed to those of Familiar scopeThe child will grow up in uncertainty; their vision and moral world will be unstable and a source of constant conflict, which will also translate into social and moral instability. Therefore, their family, social and emotional self-esteem They will be severely affected. Similarly, in the stage of adolescence, in which it is built the autonomyIndividual values become more established, while family values are challenged. It is common for these values to become more pronounced. behavioral disorders especially in the family sphere, it appears promiscuity , the rebellion and fostered in schools through the content of gender ideology. This situation makes them especially vulnerable to sexual assaults. adults. The peer relationships They are not based on commitment and respect, but on utilitarian and genitalized objectification between the sexes.
We have the accumulated experience of countries that have implemented this type of sex education for decades. We only need to see if the situation anticipated here has actually occurred.
Therefore, either we move towards a single way of thinking and accept that the governments of the day interfere in the minds of our children, or we stand for freedom and diversity and we, as parents, take charge of their education, respecting the obvious: that society is plural and should remain so.
Read also:
